Good genes help myth debunked why some smokers keep healthy lungs focus online

Good genes help: Myth debunked: Why some smokers keep healthy lungsPlease highlight appropriate words in text. With only two clicks report the error to the editor.

Whether smokers or non-smokers, genetic factors determine lung health. British researchers have now identified for the first time six gene variations directly linked to lung health.

The chronic lung disease COPD often affects smokers.
Others smoke all their life without damaging their lungs.
Researchers have found the gene that protects some smokers.

Smoking is considered the most common cause of death worldwide. It can cause many different diseases, from cardiovascular conditions to various lung diseases such as cancer or COPD.

COPD is a chronic disease of the lungs due to inflamed and permanently narrowed airways. Smokers are especially likely to get it. Symptoms resemble those of asthma.

What protects smokers from COPD?

Amazingly, there are people who smoke all their lives and still maintain healthy lungs. What protects them?

Scientists from the British universities of Leicester and Nottingham investigated whether there is a genetic reason why some people get COPD and others do not. In one study they examined 50.000 subjects with and without COPD, including heavy smokers as well as people who never smoked.

Result: Using blood and urine samples, the scientists were able to prove that genetic factors are responsible for how the lungs grow and how they can heal themselves. Exactly what the connection is, however, is still unclear. This applies to both smokers and non-smokers.

This daily habit is as deadly as smoking

This daily habit is as deadly as smoking

Good genes help myth debunked why some smokers keep healthy lungs focus online

Six gene variations determine lung health

For their study, the scientists drew on the U.K biobank back, the medical data of 500.0000 volunteers saved. They linked this data to a genetic analysis of participants in their own study.

They then compared the genetic variations they found with the participants' lung function and smoking behavior. They came across six genetic variations that appear to be directly related to lung health. One of these variations affects chromosome 17, which is linked to the healthy lungs of both smokers and non-smokers.

If scientists succeed in showing exactly what the link is, it could open up new treatment options for COPD. The best recipe against COPD, however, remains: do not smoke!

Video: Woman freaks out because she's not allowed to smoke

COPD World Day

Underestimated, but deadly: Why the morning cough threatens life

Controversial custom

A tradition divides Switzerland: children smoke at Appenzell cattle shows

What asthmatics should watch out for

The 10 most common misconceptions about asthma

Friday, 16.11.2018 | 00:26 | MARC PIECH

. Was a chain smoker, and smoked about 80 cigarettes a day, lived to be almost 100 years old, and smoked for about 80 years. let's break it down 80 cigarettes a day is 2400 cigarettes a month, or 28.800 cigarettes a year and that multiplied by 80 equals 2.304.000 cigarettes that Mr. Schmitz may have smoked in his lifetime, purely in terms of calculation. . And then I privately know someone who had his first heart attack at 21 because of 20 cigarettes a day, and his doctor advised him to quit smoking, otherwise he would have his third and thus probably fatal heart attack at about 30. two extreme examples, but also show that Gina is probably really responsible. .

Sunday, 20.05.2018 | 19:08 | Gerhard Drost

also asked the following questions: 1. Who paid for the study, and 2. what, which and how much did the scientists involved in this get in benefits from the client(s) for this. It is well known that industry "scientific" Fund studies to portray their products in a positive light. Only independent studies (usually financed by public money) are relatively objective and credible. I say and know this as a long-time employee in the administration of a scienti. Institute.

Tuesday, 26.12.2017 | 02:37 | Fritz – Ulrich Hein | 1 Answer

Especially in the current time, one should be happy about every dead smoker, who is already in the pension / retirement. On the one hand, nothing is done medically against the fact that people are getting older and older, on the other hand, governments moan about empty pension/retirement funds. How does this fit together? Let us consider that after 1945 up to ca. 1980 a decent pensioner retired with 65 and with 66 1/2 the pension fund by death relieved and today the aging society should work longer. Nobody thought about the pensioners, who easily work until 80(?) could, provided they held office jobs. This is what we should be thinking about, not how to make life even more miserable for us smokers. As Abschrechungsbild sticks on my box Merkels picture.

Sunday, 20.05.2018 | 20:16 | MARC PIECH

Mrs. Merkel does not smoke, however, and if you take it very seriously, the Chancellor is even highly intelligent, because otherwise she would not be in such a position today! It's just a pity that it doesn't use its intelligence for its own people, but against its own people.

nn but the warning label must be changed. Smokers should be warned about bad genes. Unfortunately, the genes are excluded from the exchange.

Friday, 23.10.2015 | 11:46 | Ronny Soo | 2 replies

is actually "healthier" in the fresh air compared to a non-smoker who lives on a busy city street, just put it this way. Scientifically, this can certainly not yet be proven. Many influences and factors play a role in the final effect, whether someone falls ill or not. and for this our science and medicine will still need several years to find the factors to a "disease" to find. I think we are only at the beginning

We have to question that too. We have to question everything, because this is our topic. Only global warming belongs to the untouchable sacred cows. Only this gives us support.

It is not the first and certainly not the last increase in knowledge of orthodox medicine that in the course of genetic research the realization is increasingly gaining ground that all non-acquirable diseases (everything except diseases caused by infection or accidents) are stringently gene-dispositioned. This does not only concern lung smoker discredits or the connection of other cancers, which are genetically manifested! This also applies to all pathological addictive diseases, which are mapped uniformly in percentages worldwide. The fact that the open handling of these findings happens only very sparingly is due to the fact that one can use these disease patterns excellently for stigmatization politically as well as commercially and does it.

Friday, 02.10. COPD smoker. Non-smoker meets. Maybe the gene that increases the risk of COPD is also responsible for the pleasure of smoking. Then it would not matter whether someone smokes or not, everything depended on the gene.

Friday, 02.10.2015 | 06:12 | Karl Haas

There must be something to it. So if you take two famous politicians, Churchill and Helmut Schmidt, who smoked all their lives and got along without COPD, and my neighbor who never smoked but has COPD, there are probably genetic differences. These, so one determined one is to play also with cancer illnesses a role. As a former smoker, I have stopped smoking, because my genes apparently do not tolerate it, while my wife has an advantage here and it works for her, although on the cigarette packets it says, who smokes dies, it does not help with her – thank God. If the researchers think that their research could lead to new therapies for COPD, let them continue, for the benefit of smokers.

Friday, 02.10.2015 | 06:03 | Sonja Hirsch

U. any disease. Only in recent years has m.E. It has become increasingly clear how much our health is genetically predetermined. to our descendants plus the environmental conditions under which we live, which in turn have an influence on us, determine. Whoever lives happily by the sea on a green island passes on genetically better than the one who smokes every day. City stress u. is exposed to the dirtiest air.

Friday, 02.10.2015 | 05:42 | Christoph Kehrer | 2 Responses

If I have the useful gene variant, then I can also smoke! Therefore, it would be absolutely desirable that everyone had his genetic makeup analyzed and that behavior could be coordinated to strengthen or prevent good or negative characteristics. Yes, I know, in Germany the dangers of this are overrated.

Smoke quietly.

Recent studies have found precancerous lesions (this is the first step to tumors, where you get a nice titanium mandible bone after having half of your neck muscles and most of your tongue amputated) in about 60% of smokers. Any drug with such scary side effects would have been taken off the market long ago.

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: